<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cinephile At Large &#187; Film Daily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinephile-at-large.com/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=8" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinephile-at-large.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:58:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>April 14th</title>
		<link>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=972</link>
		<comments>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=972#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cinephile</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, this site is updated. April is films about rabbits month so stay tuned to see which films I’ve chosen for recommendation. In the coming weeks I’ll also be working on getting up some reviews I haven’t posted or written yet.
I saw on the news today that Sigourney Weaver said something to the fact that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="padding-top: 5px; padding-right: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">Finally, this site is updated. April is films about rabbits month so stay tuned to see which films I’ve chosen for recommendation. In the coming weeks I’ll also be working on getting up some reviews I haven’t posted or written yet.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 5px; padding-right: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">I saw on the news today that Sigourney Weaver said something to the fact that Kathryn Bigelow only won the oscar because she was a woman and because the academy likes to award small films that no one sees. Fact: Hurt Locker is amazing. I don’t care who directed it, if you forget for a minute who did direct it you can see it’s masterfully put together and well controlled. I don’t care if a kid directed it. Bigelow did a better job creating a cohesive, strong, moving human drama than any of the other directors nominated. Fact: the academy tends not to give the big awards to animated films, or even comedies for that matter. That doesn’t mean Avatar should have won. I’ll say this once – Avatar is crap filmmaking at it’s best. The best of the worst crap out there. Poor dialogue, no story, no real “acting”, it’s basically a cartoon. Way to go Cameron, you have yet again produced another piece of self-indulgent tripe. Fact: Sigourney Weaver doesn’t know good filmmaking, she is after all, an actor – in a James Cameron “film”. Even Jason Reitman knows Bigelow’s win was well-deserved and I usually don’t have good things to say about him but at least he knows a masterful piece of art when he sees it and acknowledges it as such.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 5px; padding-right: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">I’m glad the Hurt Locker beat out Avatar. Who cares if it’s a small film? Just because a film cost millions of dollars to make and made billions at the box office doesn’t mean it’s a landmark in cinema? It just means people are transfixed by the hype surrounding it and are too stupid to know a genuine film from a genuine piece of crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=972</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 28th</title>
		<link>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=974</link>
		<comments>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=974#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cinephile</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been in crapville for a month. Once I get out, I’ll update this sucka.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been in crapville for a month. Once I get out, I’ll update this sucka.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=974</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 2nd</title>
		<link>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=919</link>
		<comments>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=919#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cinephile</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thats right, woodchuck-chuckers – it’s GROUNDHOG DAY!
I’ll give you a winter prediction: It’s gonna be cold, it’s gonna be grey, and it’s gonna last you for the rest of your life.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="padding-top: 5px; padding-right: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">Thats right, woodchuck-chuckers – it’s GROUNDHOG DAY!</p>
<p style="padding-top: 5px; padding-right: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">I’ll give you a winter prediction: It’s gonna be cold, it’s gonna be grey, and it’s gonna last you for the rest of your life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=919</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 7th</title>
		<link>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=871</link>
		<comments>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=871#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cinephile</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coming soon… my review of Land of the Lost and you will definitely want to stick around to read that one. Currently working on one for Inglorious Basterds. No, not the 1970s picture, Inglorious Bastards, try not to get them confused. Tarantino solved that problem by spelling bastards the wrong way, see. Clever girl.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming soon… my review of <em style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Land of the Lost</em> and you will definitely want to stick around to read that one. Currently working on one for <em style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Inglorious Basterds</em>. No, not the 1970s picture, <em style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Inglorious Bastards</em>, try not to get them confused. Tarantino solved that problem by spelling bastards the wrong way, see. Clever girl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=871</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 4th</title>
		<link>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=868</link>
		<comments>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=868#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cinephile</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinephile-at-large.com/?p=868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What better way to start off a new year then with a month full of vampire films? One of my favourite films from TIFF ‘09 Daybreakers is finally having it’s wide release on January 8th, and to celebrate how awesome that film is, I’ve dedicated the entire month to vampire films. And as always, I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="padding-top: 5px; padding-right: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">What better way to start off a new year then with a month full of vampire films? One of my favourite films from TIFF ‘09 <em style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Daybreakers</em> is finally having it’s wide release on January 8th, and to celebrate how awesome that film is, I’ve dedicated the entire month to vampire films. And as always, I have included old films from the 20s and 30s so you can see the progression of the vampire lore on film. Don’t expect to see <em style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Twilight</em> any where near my recommendations because that would be just so wrong. If you want to see real vampires just keep checking the screenings this week page, or watch True Blood (aka one of the best shows ever).</p>
<p style="padding-top: 5px; padding-right: 20px; padding-bottom: 5px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">Happy viewing, and don’t forget to sleep with the light on, and a little garlic by your bedside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cinephile-at-large.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=868</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
