Archive for October, 2009

Mother (1926)

Directed by Vsevolod Pudovkin, this film is about one mother’s struggle with her family and country, during the 1905 Revolution. A wonderfully political film.

October (1928)

Sergei Eisenstein tells the revolutionary story about the ten days that shook the world: February 1917, the monarchy in the Soviet Union is dissolved, and then comes the end of the provisional government. An arrest is issued for Lenin, and in October for 10 days the Bolsheviks strike, ready to take over the government while fighting the Mensheviks.

Friday 9 October

This week’s featured filmmaker is Sergei Eisenstein. Not only are his films highly political and important pieces of Soviet history but he pioneered the idea of film montage and the different kinds of montage one can use in a film to promote their own ideals. His films are genius.

Subjective vs. Objective nature of film discussions. Can film be discussed objectively? I say it can. What say you?

Alright, so I recently read somewhere I can’t remember, an article talking about the objectivity vs. subjectivity when talking about films. Most people think that discussions about film are entirely subjective but what some film critics like Ebert have shown is that there is potential for these discussions to be objective. I suppose, as long as there are clear examples and reasons behind what you’re discussing it can be seen as an objective opinion – it can be seen as a fact. For example, if in reviewing a film you give clear facts and examples behind your reasoning it becomes a well-structured objective piece rather than a subjective, unreasoned opinionated feeling.

Either way you look at it, whether film discussions are subjective or objective, it still remains an opinion and how well you argue it depends on how good that opinion is and what you can say to prop up your argument. Therefore in some instances, there is a right and a wrong answer and that depends on how well you can argue your point with relevant facts and observations. But there will always be people who find something wrong with an objective argument and will use pieces of that argument to make their own subjective opinion against it. To them I say, ‘whatever floats your boat’. Everyone has an opinion, but the important thing is to read and watch critically with an open mind and respect and appreciation for what you are watching, reading or discussing.

So, what do you think about the subjective vs. objective nature of film discussions? Can there be well-reasoned objective arguments for or against a certain film or film movement? Or is the discussion of film completely subjective? What about those who turn subjectivity into negativity to argue how wrong something is? I think this happens all the time, when people fail to respectfully argue against an opinion and it turns into an emotional negative argument against the film or discussion.

What say you? I welcome your comments on this subjective vs. objective nature of film discussions. And don’t nitpick what I say, I’m simply opening up a new discussion on this topic. Please be respectful of other people’s arguments.

07Oct

October 7th

All of the films I saw at the Toronto International Film Festival have been reviewed and posted.

October is Russian films month so keep checking the screenings section each week for recommended Russian films. I have picked ones ranging from the 1920s to the present, so enjoy!

07Oct

Gran Torino

Director: Clint Eastwood
Writer: Nick Schenk, Dave Johannson
2008

I will admit I haven’t liked a lot of Clint Eastwood’s recent films, so I was not expecting much from this one, but I was pleasantly surprised. This film is really great, especially Clint Eastwood’s performance as a prejudiced all-American war veteran (Walt Kowalski) living in a completely ethnic neighbourhood. Everything from the way he delivered his lines, to his death stares and snarl were perfect for bringing his character to life. Through the course of the film, the racially ignorant Walt finds his way into the lives of his Korean neighbours and what unfolds is a wonderful story about life, acceptance and friendship. At times, some of the things Walt says are so politically incorrect that is is in fact quite humerous because it just shows how much he does not know about anyone else – the beautiful thing about the story is he is willing to learn. For all his faults, Walt is undoubtedly a cool, tough guy and even becomes a likable character, and it’s not just because he’s Clint Eastwood. Go see Gran Torino, you will not be disappointed.

pop3.5